punnett square

The colors of my children’s eyes make a perfect Punnett Square. It’s the diagram you use to determine the probability of an offspring having a particular genetic trait. I learned about these in 9th grade biology class and the lesson has stuck with me ever since because it explains how two brown-eyed people - people like my husband and myself - still have a 25% chance of ending up with a blue-eyed child. Four kids later and we have stayed true to the numbers.

The palette of our family, though, could so easily have been otherwise: genetics is a science which makes for a fascinating art. The millions of sperm available, the multi-million varieties of DNA barreling down the fallopian tubes and, in the end, only one makes it in. To that particular egg. In that particular month. On that particular day. If sex were had at any other moment, your child might look wholly different from the way he does now.

And I’m pretty sure that most parents are obsessed with what their child looks like, whether they admit it or not. I don’t necessarily mean how cute they think the kid is (though this invariably plays a part), but rather who he looks like and where his features come from. This is, after all, the wonder of reproduction: how you and your partner’s genes will combine in the creation of a separate being. This is why parents spend hour upon hour gazing adoringly into the face of a new baby: to see if they can find an origin for it.

There is something life-affirming about being able to trace your own features in the contours of somebody else’s. I remember my Dad, whom we didn’t see very often while we were growing up, looking at me across the dinner table doing exactly this. Mapping on my face the ways in which I was his. I used to love it when he would tell me in these moments that he could see himself in me, I don’t know why. Maybe because the biological reality of shared genes can bridge other, harder distances.

From an evolutionary point of view, the desire for your kids to look like you makes sense. Historically, we are more likely to nurture - and endure risk for - those that are obviously our own. Infants are said to resemble their fathers at birth for just this reason, so that Dad sticks around despite an inevitable uncertainty about paternity. But we aren’t living in the caves anymore. Modernity has allowed us to be more judgmental about which physical traits we would prefer to see trickle down from which parent and which ones we would rather disappear altogether.

We can have preferences in theory, of course, but we can’t actually do anything about them. That’s the rub. When I was pregnant for the first time, my sister wrote an ode to my unborn child, which included the line: ‘We will wait for ten tiny fingers, ten tiny toes and here’s to hoping they come with her hair and his nose!’ Or something like that. Objectively speaking, as she wasn’t afraid to point out, my husband has the better nose and I have the better hair and baby number one happened, just happened to luck out on both fronts.

It’s a crapshoot, though, that’s what the Punnett Square tells us. And it’s hard to say (though hugely interesting) what impact, if any, the distribution of desirable/undesirable, maternal/paternal traits have on our relationship with a given child. There is a common assumption that a parent naturally gravitates toward a kid that looks just like her, but surely it’s more complicated than that. Do we become more or less forgiving of our own foibles when they appear in our offspring as opposed to the mirror?

And what happens when the kid looks almost nothing like you? This is a reality for many mixed-ethnicity couples, where the gene pool is larger and more diverse. My daughter is her father’s side through and through and I have to confess that I feel a small loss in this. Probably because she is a girl and there is an unwritten expectation that patterns of resemblance should follow along gender lines. I run her fine, feathery hair through my fingers and know that she has been denied something about my own appearance that I take pride in. Her brothers have all inherited the thick hair, but they won’t care. Then again, she might not either.

Aesthetics matter to parents because we want our kids to be attractive in the same way we want them to be smart and happy and well-adjusted: these attributes, on the whole, make for an easier life. But they also matter because they are a mark of a family’s continuity. Sometimes in our children we see lurking not ourselves, but our own parents and their history. This can be a wonderful gift as they get older and begin to leave this world, a constant reminder of the way the generations will always fit together.

Flawed or not, faces tell stories that need to be told. I have a particular fondness, in this way, for my second son’s eyes, which are down-turned and almond-shaped like my father’s, but impossibly dark like my mother’s. They are, at once, the present and the past: distinctly his own but also a poignant relic of a union long since dissolved, a union without which neither one of us would be here in the first place.

our punnett square: from dominant to recessive

our punnett square: from dominant to recessive


Filed under parenting

4 responses to “punnett square

  1. Linzi

    Love this Lauren - very poignant. I lost my Dad when I was 14 and there was something special in recognising Zoe’s blonde curls from pictures of my Dad when we was a child - neither Mike or I have remotely curly or blonde hair. Life affirming for sure.

  2. Erin Mclennan

    Fantastic Lauren. I loved reading this- mostly because I am so familiar with the characteristics of your children and love trying to pick out yours or Adam’s features. Neither of my children look like me, and this really bothers me! I am not embarrassed to admit that when I considered a third child, the thought crossed my mind that maybe I could have one who resembled me in some slightly more obvious way. The Punnett square should statistically hold some promise for me, right?

  3. megan

    I’ve been feeling guilty about my thoughts regarding my children’s features and felt I was the only one so I’m glad you wrote this because I don’t feel as horrible! I swear my husband gravitates towards our daughter, and I do of both of our sons because of their resemblances. Of course if I call him out on this - he acts like, “how could I pick one child over they other because I love them all the same.” I feel guilty when I look at my daughter and wished she looked a little more like me. But she may have the red hair - so I got one thing!
    As the youngest of 4 girls - my sisters and I look nothing like each other. I have 2 sisters with brown hair/brown eyes, one w/ blondish hair/blue eyes, and then me, red hair/green eyes. Talk about Mendelian genetics at work!
    Good article!

    • I’m glad you wrote in: I feel guilty for the exact same reason! And it’s not really something people talk about. With twins, it becomes very obvious and stark. My husband and I basically ‘divided’ the care of our twins when they were very young along resemblance lines, not consciously of
      course. Plus, with a boy and a girl there is always the confounding factor of
      gender. Did I gravitate towards my son because he looked more like me or because he was a boy and I was more used to those? The emphasis on appearance/resemblance is greater, I think, when they are babies because so much of what defines them is how they look. Their personalities have yet to meaningfully emerge.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s